Are We Raising Kids Who Could Storm Omaha Beach?

Mike, those are some fascinating articles, and I'll try to read the book in between gaming sessions.  It strikes me that for some time we've been orienting our kids toward a world that doesn't--and can't--exist, a world drained of significant conflict, violence, or pain.  So when the world as it is rears its ugly head, they aren't trained to respond in a constructive way.  I'm not all that surprised about the Clifford/Star Wars study, but in a different way.  People who are raised in sanitized environments are often the first to learn that violence and aggression are very quick shortcuts to accomplishing their goals, mostly because they are surrounded by easily intimidated people. 

Ever since my deployment, I have a different perspective on child-rearing.  There is brutality out there that we cannot fathom or imagine, and I don’t want to raise delicate little flowers who can survive and thrive only so long as they are walled off in our idyllic rural enclave here in Tennessee.  I guess the short way of saying this is that I want to raise a son who could storm Omaha Beach.  Not that I would want him to face such horror, but I want to raise him to be a man who could.  

Look, we're in a long war.  I expect to be still fighting in Afghanistan 10 years from now.  And I don't want either of my kids to be the type of people who will assume that others will do the fighting for them.  And in that sense, I think the year I spent in Iraq--introducing them to the idea that our country and our liberty are worth fighting for and when they know that some of Daddy's friends died in that fight--could be the best parenting I ever did or will do.

David French

David French is a Harvard educated lawyer, writer, and soldier. His next book, about his year spent in Iraq, comes out on July 4, 2011. Connect with him on Facebook at http://www.facebook.com/DavidAustinFrench and follow him on Twitter at https://twitter.com/davidafrench.
Bookmark and Share Read more in: RainDrop > Lifestyle

Comments

by fizzbin #

on Wednesday, Feb 17th 2010 @ 13:57pm
The Nazis always accused Americans of being soft, weak, and not warrior material. We won our portion of the war any, despite child rearing practices that back then were much milder by comparison to those in Germany. How then, did we find men to storm the beaches? I note Ambrose's remarks than the American men who went to war wanted to be throwing baseballs, not hand grenades, but that there was a terrible evil loose in the world and it had to be stopped. They did. So, I'm not sure the issue if how gently we raise our children. I would be more concerned with their being taught that violence is always wrong and solves nothing, when some times it is simply necessary.

by Anonymous #

on Sunday, Feb 21st 2010 @ 9:08am
fizzbin, our children are taught that all violence is wrong, America is oppressive and unredeemable, and 9/11 was brought upon ourselves by such nastiness. This is wrong; "All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing," as Edmund Burke said. People like Saddam Hussein and Osama bin Laden depend upon it.

by Clayton Heselschwerdt #

on Tuesday, May 31st 2011 @ 9:09am
I know this article is a bit old, but I just wanted to through my 2 cents at fizzbin.

We won our portion of the war by muscling our industrial edge. In short we out built the enemy. You blow up one tank, we make 3 more.

As for how we raise our children I will not get involved on the topic, but look around you, "My cell phone broke" is the Rapture!

Post Your Comment

Got something to say? Join the conversation by adding your comment below. Name, email and comment are required.

Log in with facebook to post this comment to your wall!
name@host.com
http://your-website.com


Please, no HTML or other tags in the comments