College: A No-Brainer?

+ enlarge 1 of 1
Should all kids go to college?  New statistics suggest they shouldn't.
Should all kids go to college? New statistics suggest they shouldn't.

"I want my child to go deeply in debt to become lazy, anxious, boozy, unthinking, and ignorant."

No parent actually says these words precisely, but they in fact encapsulate some of the most ambitious goals of parents in the United States.  We scrimp, save, and take out loans (and have our kids take out loans) for precisely that very outcome. We look askance at children who aren’t following the same path, as if there's something inherently wrong with them.  For millions of parents, this is their Holy Grail.  

But they typically phrase their desire this way:

"I want my child to go to college."

Some emerging -- and dreadful -- facts about the modern, heavily subsidized (but still absurdly expensive) everyone-should-go-to-college push are causing many people to reconsider sending their kids to university.  Here is the reality:

-Your child will likely not spend much time actually studying.  In 1961, students spent approximately 24 hours per week studying.  What about now?  They top out around 14 hours.  If you think your teenager/young adult can learn more in 14 hours than 1961 young adults could learn in 24, you either believe evolution works faster than it does or you wear those legendary "parent-colored glasses" that view your child as the super-special snowflake capable of greater achievement than mere mortals.

-Your child has a 44% chance of filling their spare time with binge drinking and are more likely to drink, drink heavily, and binge drink than students who don't go to college.

-Your child may actually unlearn things they learned in high school.  In recent years, the Intercollegiate Studies Institute has released a Civic Literacy Report which tracks students' civic knowledge from their Freshman year through graduation.  The results are shocking.  At some schools -- even top schools like Cornell and Duke -- students graduate with less civic knowledge than when they started.  Among the more lurid statistics, one-third of college students can't name the three branches of government.

-Your child is going to be pushed in one political direction.  People of all political stripes read SixSeeds, and we should be able to agree that students should hear from more than one political/ideological perspective while in college.  Yet the reality is that our colleges and universities are among the least ideologically diverse institutions in the United States, with professors less likely to believe in God than the general population and far, far more likely to be on the left side of the political spectrum.  Unsurprisingly, students -- who are subject to frequent classroom indoctrination -- leave college more liberal than they arrived

-Your child is likely to become more depressed and anxious.  One would think that the combination of massive spare time, omnipresent parties, and low academic demands would mean that students looked at college as a form of debauched Disneyland, a four-year vacation before they enter the "real world."  Yet juniors feel more depressed, overwhelmed, and anxious than entering freshmen.  

Ahh well, at least all this spare time, ignorance, and alcohol is available at a low, low price, right?  As more people have gone to college, its price has become more accessible, right?  

Wrong.  College is phenomenally expensive and its prices have risen far, far above the rate of inflation.  And these price increases have largely been financed by borrowing on a massive scale.  In fact, Americans now owe more in student loans than they do in credit cards.  Even aside from the dubious merits of much of what passes for a college education, the university economy is facing its own purely economic bubble.

Let me back up a moment.  Am I saying kids shouldn't go to college?  No.  I'm saying that not all kids should go to college and that college can be actively destructive for some.  When you dig just a bit deeper into many statements of parental conventional wisdom, like "You should spend more time with your kids" or "Your kids should go to college," you find that they either cannot be or are not anywhere close to expressions of universal truth.  As I've argued before, many families have the ability to spend more time with their kids only because other families have chosen a different path.  As for college, perhaps the better long-term outcomes for college grads over those with high school diplomas has less to do with college and more to do with the kids themselves, and the answer isn't "more college."  The answer is "building more character in children."  

The University of Tennessee's Glenn Reynolds put it well:

The government decides to try to increase the middle class by subsidizing things that middle class people have: If middle-class people go to college and own homes, then surely if more people go to college and own homes, we’ll have more middle-class people. But homeownership and college aren’t causes of middle-class status, they’re markers for possessing the kinds of traits — self-discipline, the ability to defer gratification, etc. — that let you enter, and stay, in the middle class. Subsidizing the markers doesn’t produce the traits; if anything, it undermines them.

It’s time to look at college with fresh eyes – and yes, to even do a cost-benefit analysis of the whole experience.  Instead of writing that tuition check (or, taking out that loan), at least pause to consider whether your child could possibly be better off getting a job, learning a skill, or even putting on a uniform.

College shouldn’t be a no-brainer.

Read more from this author:

Graduates, It's Not About You After All

We Want to Be Better Than We Are

Is Your Family a Group of Hobbits?

Is Jack Bauer Good for my Family?

David French

David French is a Harvard educated lawyer, writer, and soldier. His next book, about his year spent in Iraq, comes out on July 4, 2011. Connect with him on Facebook at http://www.facebook.com/DavidAustinFrench and follow him on Twitter at https://twitter.com/davidafrench.
Bookmark and Share Read more in: Life > Lifestyle

Comments

by Katie #

on Friday, Sep 24th 2010 @ 8:16am
God forbid our children go to college and become more liberal! You know, those liberals who care deeply about things like taking care of the sick and the poor--you know Jesus hates everything about them. D@m# socialists. On the other hand, have your children put on a uniform! Because the kind of "indoctrination" they're likely to get at college = bad. Military indoctrination = good. More importantly, I'm pretty sure that when Jesus said "Love your enemies, do good to those who hate you, bless those who curse you, pray for those who mistreat you," what he really MEANT was "hate your enemies, put on a uniform and go KILL them." That crazy Jesus--nice guy, but had trouble expressing himself clearly.

And you are so right about the ridiculous dreams of the middle class to send their children to college. College should only be for those who can afford to pay cash for it. The children of the lower and middle classes need not waste their time on such nonsense--we need more low-paid workers! THAT is the job of lower and middle class parents: raise up minimum wage workers and soldiers to serve the "needs" (ie, whims and greedy desires) of the wealthy.

Great article. I'll be coming back to this site often. HA!

by Toni Becker #

on Friday, Sep 24th 2010 @ 11:08am
Actually, I believe that parents have been sending their kids off to crazy town colleges and not taking the time to arm their children with the moral fortitude, passionate patriotism and fundamental Truths with which they'll even have a prayer of STANDING against the assaults of liberalism in college. Why? Because they abdicated their responsibility by trusting a state-run school system to do the work for them. THAT has severe consequences and we're now reaping what we've sown. Thank God for Hillsdale College.....I would be honored to send my kids there.

by Ida Holder #

on Friday, Sep 24th 2010 @ 11:30am
No. Success comes in many forms.

by Richard Apollo Fuhriman #

on Friday, Sep 24th 2010 @ 14:40pm
Just got the JD and can't find a job (and the tuition went from $25k/year to $35k/year in 3 years...good ROI? not yet)

I would never suggest going to an out-of-state school (without full scholarships). Best education I got was at some local community college...better than most of my BYU undergrad, my U. of Oregon MS and Seattle U law...

Not for everyone.

by todd #

on Friday, Sep 24th 2010 @ 14:48pm
David, I believe your article is meaning to express that parents and children should be deliberate in making the college choice. However, the article comes across as marginalizing the value of college.

I believe formal education beyond high school to be extremely important to an individual's future. By education I include college, trade school, etc. (The value of experience is not to be diminished in this statement). The quality of your thought process is greater after obtaining a doctorate than when you were in high school. I presume that having your conservative background contrasted to the liberal ideas at college also was part of forming your thinking. I think everyone can benefit from a solid post high school education.

Now, laziness is a problem. As a parent I expect my children to get a job during high school and college. I recognize that they may be able to earn higher grades or develop a talent better if they didn’t have to work. However, the time spent working gives a person ownership of their own life and balance in how they view the world and other people. Idle time isn't a good thing and the inability to work hard will be obvious when entering the work force. The ability to work hard is what gains the respect of self, co-workers, employers, and employees. My dream is not to put my child through college—my dream is to backup my child putting him[her]self through college.
Thank you for the article.

by Steve #

on Friday, Sep 24th 2010 @ 16:13pm
Mr. French,

I have two children that have graduated college (one graduated law school, as well), one in college, and a high school senior. I let them know that I would pay if they majored in Engineering or Business. Other than that, it is a waste of time. You are correct that their professors will attempt to indoctrinate them. That is why conservatives are smarter than liberals. Liberals write what their professors want to hear and believe it. Conservatives are smart enough to write what their professors want to hear and then laugh at the professor's ignorance later. Katie (comment 1) won't like it, but my son graduated with a degree in Engineering and then went into the Army (ROTC scholarship). The military did not try to indoctrinate like the liberal arts professors did.

by Vicki Boyd #

on Friday, Sep 24th 2010 @ 16:52pm
I have one one who I don't will go to a traditional school if she even goes. However, I don't doubt she can be successful at the profession she wants to be in. I have been discovering she is not much on traditional schooling.

by Ami Self #

on Friday, Sep 24th 2010 @ 16:53pm
NO! I think lots of people (lots of homeschoolers, of course) are looking at that trend hard and finding great ways to be self-educated. I know my personal education has flourished since I've graduated from college, and it's definitly not BECAUSE I graduated from college. Of course, I don't bring in an income. And I'm awfully glad my college educated husband - who is in a profession that requires a degree - does bring in an income! Do you think there's hope of returning to the days of entering professions like Law and Engineering without a diploma? I think we'd have some truly educated people then.

by Tonya Webb Jackson #

on Friday, Sep 24th 2010 @ 17:11pm
I will probably encourage my sons to earn an online degree or attend a Christian University.

by Bettie Gobble #

on Saturday, Sep 25th 2010 @ 9:15am
absolutely not! so many go, needlessly, because their friends are going, and what would people think? although I do think that trend is less now than years ago. some degrees are very, very necessary...but the world is full of other worthwhile professions than doctors, lawyers and indian chiefs! i never went and not embarressed, for i became (at an early age) what i always wanted to be ..wife, mother...now grandmother!! in today's world...do we really want the "true, college experience" for our young people?? scary thought, unless they are really grounded and prepared for what lies out there and can handle the freedom! i am afraid, no matter how well nurtured at home, school...few are...for the adolescent brain has a "mind of it's own" and that mind is often a time-bomb, waiting to go off in wrong direction. gotta go, nancy...as usual could write more...gotta get the hang of shorter comments!!!!"

by Nancy French #

on Saturday, Sep 25th 2010 @ 9:17am
Thanks, guys, for the comments. I had the worst of both worlds. I went to school for a bit, got college debt, and quit. So I had college debt AND no college degree! :)

by Alma Hale #

on Saturday, Sep 25th 2010 @ 11:22am
Interesting article. I am curious about the price of college education increasing faster than inflation. I would be interested to compare private vs. public on the rate of increase. I teach at a small university in the Minnesota state college and university system. I haven't verified this, but supposedly by state law something like 2/3 of school expenses must be paid for by the state (taxes), with the other 1/3 coming from tuition and fund raising, etc. As I understand it, the state is now paying less than 1/2 of the expenses, making it so tuition must be increased in order to pay the bills. I'm wondering if tuition was historically artificially low, due to state sponsorship, and as the state pays less of a percentage it accelerates the rate of tuition increases. And if that is the case, what excuse would private schools give for huge rate increases.

by Victor #

on Saturday, Sep 25th 2010 @ 17:41pm
In response to Katie. This is the kind of "leftist non thinking" that the article is talking about. Liberalism isn't defined as caring for the poor, it's far more accurately defined as "finding problems in society to force someone else to address". If there's poverty, the Liberal does not dive in and help, they petition the government to make rich people help.

This isn't "Jesus' message" at all, he didn't petition for the Pharisees to be forced to pay for the poor and sick in Jerusalem, he didn't lead any "populist revolts" against wealth. He did say that there are certain attitudes among those who focus on wealth that are common among them that keep them separated from him, but it was the internal attitudes that he cared about, not legislation. He also was opposed to publicly sharing your charitable acts for the world to see.

He also didn't share your hostility towards soldiers, nor did he make them give up their profession once saved. There are two examples of Roman centurions, both saved, both continued to be soldiers afterward.

You are displaying the very common "shallow knowledge" that this article is about, in your veiled hostility towards it, and your smugness with your own "goodness". There is nothing good about a political bias in education regardless of where it's derived, and it's undisputable that in today's "higher education", there is a far left leaning bias that tries to influence students, at a time in their development when they're the most idealistic, the least experienced, and the least prepared for an onslaught of indoctrination.

by Rebecca Cusey #

on Saturday, Sep 25th 2010 @ 22:04pm
I have to say, after years of bouncing around DC...there's a lot that a college degree can get you, especially from the right colleges. I know some of it is a game, or jockying for position, but I hate to see kids opting out of being able to scale the highest mountains. Sure, you can scale them without a degree from Stanford, but it sure helps. You're very unlikely to become a Supreme Court Justice with a community college degree.

by gene #

on Monday, Sep 27th 2010 @ 2:43am
David,
You and your group are a class act....degree or no degree.
There is no one MAP for everyone!
Some occupations require a degree some don't. A report stated that in the future the best paying jobs will involve more science and math. Sounds like a degree!?
One of my sons graduated from BYU...none of the others have degrees. They all are comfortable.Education comes in many forms . I prefer streamlined study. Don't force a student to
study something that absolutely has nothing to do with their
choice of occupation! That is just more rotten politics!
Two of my sons are making very good money and love what they
are doing ! That is bad? Smile.(no degree)
I believe in college...for some and be very careful where you send them.
Once I quit a job in a major aerospace co. and came back and was told "if you didn't have your expertise and connections
you wouldn't be interviewed w/out a degree! Believe me it didn't require a degree! More BS! In fact, a degree would
not help one bit...it took HANDS ON savvy !
Gene

by David Beckner #

on Monday, Sep 27th 2010 @ 8:52am
I believe that you are correct in saying that a college degree is not for everyone, but it helps. A degree does not necessarily prepare you for your chosen field. On the job training does that - with or without a degree. I don't know of many doctors who go directly from medical school to brain surgery without a little OJT first. Simply put, a college degree will help open doors for which a person of lesser "education" is not able to do.

As far as indoctrination goes, it amazes me that even at the university level, they still try to push this Pi r squared theorem hokum. Ask anyone from the great volunteer state of Tennessee and they will tell you that pie are round. Cornbread are square!

Post Your Comment

Got something to say? Join the conversation by adding your comment below. Name, email and comment are required.

Log in with facebook to post this comment to your wall!
name@host.com
http://your-website.com


Please, no HTML or other tags in the comments
Should all kids go to college?  New statistics suggest they shouldn't.
Should all kids go to college? New statistics suggest they shouldn't.